下载 少数派 2.0 客户端、关注 少数派公众号，解锁全新阅读体验 📰
高溢价的“生态游戏”与无限下沉的“白菜狂欢”巨头描绘着生态闭环的宏大蓝图时，AI硬件市场却呈现出一种分裂的繁荣：
，这一点在51吃瓜中也有详细论述
Мощный удар Израиля по Ирану попал на видео09:41
The real annoying thing about Opus 4.6/Codex 5.3 is that it’s impossible to publicly say “Opus 4.5 (and the models that came after it) are an order of magnitude better than coding LLMs released just months before it” without sounding like an AI hype booster clickbaiting, but it’s the counterintuitive truth to my personal frustration. I have been trying to break this damn model by giving it complex tasks that would take me months to do by myself despite my coding pedigree but Opus and Codex keep doing them correctly. On Hacker News I was accused of said clickbaiting when making a similar statement with accusations of “I haven’t had success with Opus 4.5 so you must be lying.” The remedy to this skepticism is to provide more evidence in addition to greater checks and balances, but what can you do if people refuse to believe your evidence?